http://theappslab.disqus.com/enTue, 25 Sep 2007 21:23:44 -0000http://theappslab.com/2007/09/24/moar-power/#comment-2546307<p>Hey, it was Deathstar-1.0 that was destroyed (thanks to that son-of-a-no good, heavy-breathing mattel pin-up doll. If he'd just open sourced it, that backdoor into the power core would never have made it into production).</p><p>But we're talking Deathstar-2.0 dude!</p>PaulTue, 25 Sep 2007 21:23:44 -0000http://theappslab.com/2007/09/24/moar-power/#comment-2546306<p>No one's flaming you. Stay on your side of the line.</p>JakeTue, 25 Sep 2007 13:14:27 -0000http://theappslab.com/2007/09/24/moar-power/#comment-2546305<p>er, Deathstar 2.0 was destroyed by a massive, Lando-led, flame war.</p>billyTue, 25 Sep 2007 11:23:34 -0000http://theappslab.com/2007/09/24/moar-power/#comment-2546304<p>Heh, what would Deathstar 2.0 be? Vader would probably blog about it first, collecting ideas, getting comments. Then, they'd open a wiki for collaborative ideas, including the Rebels of course. They are part of the community. What about Superstar 2.0? <br>Jake</p>JakeMon, 24 Sep 2007 23:37:16 -0000http://theappslab.com/2007/09/24/moar-power/#comment-2546303<p>"... talk of the Gartner shindig last week was all about *2.0 ..."</p><p>Deathstar-2.0? Like it ... better that "enterturd-2.0" which always stuck on my tongue;-)</p>PaulMon, 24 Sep 2007 22:02:40 -0000