Rails mantra is "fat models and skinny controllers" :) In your case controllers seem to be more fat than models. Why is it so?
Rich Manalang
· 1 year ago
We're familiar with the credo. Don't let the numbers fool you. Our controllers are actually pretty skinny (and our models are pretty fat). We just have lots of controller actions. And... to by honest, there's quite a bit of refactoring to be done.
If we ever open source the code, you'll see.
bex
· 1 year ago
That rule might not apply for JRuby... Or should I say, "all benchmarks lie"?
In JRuby, one line in the 'model' might represent an invocation of one hundred lines of Java.
Unless rake stats are smart enough to follow invoked Java code, count lines, and add that to the report... in which case, I'm impressed ;-)
bex, rake stats just counts the pure ruby code, irregardless of what it's running under (MRI or JRuby). It's a count of how much code we actually wrote.
Artem Vasiliev
· 1 year ago
Thank you, this was interesting! I thought the Mix is smaller.. and impressed by the code/test ratio )
All Comments
If we ever open source the code, you'll see.
In JRuby, one line in the 'model' might represent an invocation of one hundred lines of Java.
Unless rake stats are smart enough to follow invoked Java code, count lines, and add that to the report... in which case, I'm impressed ;-)
https://mix.oracle.com/ideas/open-source-mix-code
I thought the Mix is smaller.. and impressed by the code/test ratio )