<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>theappslab - Latest Comments in Another Call for OpenSocial App Thoughts</title><link>http://theappslab.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://theappslab.disqus.com/another_call_for_opensocial_app_thoughts_42/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 00:37:20 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Another Call for OpenSocial App Thoughts</title><link>http://theappslab.com/2008/08/05/another-call-for-opensocial-app-thoughts/#comment-1108868</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Connect lives inside the firewall, and so when we deploy the OpenSocial container, it will also live inside the firewall as part of Connect.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We will be able to host apps originating both in/outside the firewall b/c OS apps handle their own processing and infrastructure requirements (data, h/w, bandwidth, etc.).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the case of OraTweet, your OS app surfaces OraTweet into Connect, and your backend still handles the processing, including the data exchanges with Twitter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The OS container provides the social network and surfaces the app; the app does its own processing, stores its own data and leverages the network.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No fuss, no mess.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jake</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 00:37:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Call for OpenSocial App Thoughts</title><link>http://theappslab.com/2008/08/05/another-call-for-opensocial-app-thoughts/#comment-1108613</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jake, Is on my list of "to do".  Question, how are you containing inside the firewall right now?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">noelportugal</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 00:03:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Call for OpenSocial App Thoughts</title><link>http://theappslab.com/2008/08/05/another-call-for-opensocial-app-thoughts/#comment-1108389</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We can sync up later in the year for sure; we'll get some experience under our belts with Connect. Then, we can meet to brainstorm some ideas and build something cool that will benefit both communities.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There are some obvious areas for integration, since our membership probably overlaps a lot. Maybe syncronizing profiles? Or networks and invites? Lots of possibilities. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jake</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 23:25:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Call for OpenSocial App Thoughts</title><link>http://theappslab.com/2008/08/05/another-call-for-opensocial-app-thoughts/#comment-1108347</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In the coming few weeks, Ning will expand and upgrade OpenSocial support to let members of &lt;a href="http://OracleCommunity.net" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="OracleCommunity.net"&gt;OracleCommunity.net&lt;/a&gt;, and other Ning networks, easily add applications to their profiles. I'd love to exchange OpenSocial apps between &lt;a href="http://OracleCommunity.net" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="OracleCommunity.net"&gt;OracleCommunity.net&lt;/a&gt; and Mix/Connect.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eddie Awad</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 23:19:07 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>