<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Oracle AppsLab - Latest Comments in Acquisition Wednesday</title><link>http://theappslab.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:13:47 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Acquisition Wednesday</title><link>http://theappslab.com/2008/01/16/acquisition-wednesday/#comment-2546807</link><description>@Jake: SQL Server is simply too pathetic to be included in any legitimate stack.  Wino is partly tongue-in-cheek, but developer laziness in using the inferior product SQL Server is primarily what I see keeping .NET down as a platform.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael O</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:13:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Acquisition Wednesday</title><link>http://theappslab.com/2008/01/16/acquisition-wednesday/#comment-2546809</link><description>@Ted: Interesting thoughts. I have no idea, but I think there will be a standard platform push for all Apps. Stranger things have happened though.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jake</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:37:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Acquisition Wednesday</title><link>http://theappslab.com/2008/01/16/acquisition-wednesday/#comment-2546811</link><description>We like BEA; we had to jettison OAS because it clashed with PeopleTools 8.49 in Firefox and Safari in our 2007 release of PeopleSoft 9.0 applications -- WebLogic saved the day. Is this part of -- does anyone have an thoughts -- building a PeopleSoft-specific tools stack (using what we used pre-Oracle: PeopleTools, WebLogic, etc.) as opposed to a Fusion stack? As much as I like the conceptual Fusion, in practice it seems that right now the PS-specific tools are still better in the PS arena. I guess if Fusion practically happens, it will be the best of red and blue?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted Simpson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 06:14:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Acquisition Wednesday</title><link>http://theappslab.com/2008/01/16/acquisition-wednesday/#comment-2546808</link><description>@Michael O: WINO, that's crazy talk man! I would have expected WINS (S=SQL Server), but WINO is madness. Seriously, an interesting take that I'm sure would ruffle feathers in both camps. Not as cheap as SAMJ, but easier to remember. Maybe I should switch the order to JAMS. Much better.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jake</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:34:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Acquisition Wednesday</title><link>http://theappslab.com/2008/01/16/acquisition-wednesday/#comment-2546810</link><description>LAMP might not be replaced by SAMJ, but maybe it will be by WINO  =&amp;gt; &lt;a href="http://blog.crisatunity.com/2008/01/and-wino-shall-lead-them.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://blog.crisatunity.com/2008/01/and-wino-sh...&lt;/a&gt; :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael O</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:08:33 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>